| Artificial hamburger meat successfully grown in vat of bovine fetal cells; You want some fries with that?
(NaturalNews) Iím not sure which is the more offensive way to create
meat. Thereís the current "factory farm" method where masses of
hormone-jacked, antibiotics-injected cows are kept confined in what can
only be called bovine concentration camps while theyíre fed genetically
modified corn, then slaughtered without compassion and subjected to
diabolical meat-harvesting machinery that turns a cow carcass into
corporate profits. On the other hand, thereís the new method being
touted across the media: Test tube hamburgers made from thin strips of meat grown in a nutrient vat laced with bovine fetus stem cells. Yumm!
The test tube meat strips actually pulsate and twitch
during their laboratory growth phase, by the way, and theyíre
ultimately ground up with strips of test tube fat grown in a similar way
to produce a fatty hamburger-like substance. This has been accomplished
by Professor Mark Post of Maastricht University in the Netherlands, who
announced his teamís results at the American Academy for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) yesterday.
Test tube meat is here to save the world!"In
October we are going to provide a proof of concept showing out of stem
cells we can make a product that looks, feels and hopefully tastes like
meat," says Mark Post at the announcement (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/9091628/Test-tube-ham...).
Of course, what does processed meat actually taste like anyway? MSG,
sodium nitrite and processed salt, for the most part. So making
lab-grown meat taste like todayís factory-processed meat only requires
the injection of a few additives into the growth culture. Imagine
growing meat patties with MSG inside every cell!
one hamburger will require 3,000 strips of meat, each just half a
millimeter thick and grown in laboratory vats. Unlike a cow, which
requires roughly two years to grow to the point of slaughter, a test
tube burger can be produced in just six weeks.
The "benefits" of test tube hamburger production are being touted as substantial, including:
ē More efficient conversion of plants to meat.
ē Less environmental damage.
ē More humane than killing animals.
ē Is the only feasible way to feed more meat to the world.
course, they also said that GMOs would "feed the world." Bill Gates
calls genetically modified foods "high-tech agriculture" now, with the
strong implication that technology is always superior to Mother Nature (http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=1EE22C52BA26FA296CFC8A0361571555). But Iím not so sure about that. In fact, this whole thing sounds more than a little creepy to me.
Test tube meat to feed the masses? Gee, what could possibly go wrong?Iím
skeptical any time technology claims to out-perform nature. Look what
theyíve done with GMOs, chemical pesticides, vaccines, or nuclear power.
In almost every case where "scientific progress" is touted as the
solution for humankind, it ends up creating a nightmare thatís far worse than the problem it was trying to solve.
the record, I choose not to eat cow meat. Iím not a vegetarian, but
Iíve been around lots of cows on farms, and I see cows as conscious,
aware mammals who have memories, emotions, families and social
structure. They are every bit as intelligent as horses, and most people
would cringe at the idea of eating a horse burger.
in a survival situation, I would have no hesitation eating grass-fed
beef if it were from a healthy farm source. In fact, my personal supply
of preparedness foods consists of several bags of USDA organic grass-fed
beef jerky made without MSG or sodium nitrite.
But when it comes to growing hamburgers out of stem cells in a petri dish, the whole thing just smacks a little too much of soylent green.
How are we to know what they really put in the nutrient solution? Maybe
it contains growth hormones to speed production. Maybe itís loaded with
synthetic chemical vitamins instead of natural vitamins. Maybe itís
contaminated with Prozac or fluoride to make us all feel happy and
oblivious while we eat synthetic meat. How are we to know what they do
Artificial meat monstrosityAnd then, of course, itís only a matter of time before they start to genetically modify the test tube meat,
perhaps using selected genes from the human genetic code to make the
end product is more compatible with human biology while avoiding any
risk of allergies. So then what do we have? Hybrid bovine / human meat.
...and a world full of cannibals who are eating something thatís partially human flesh.
modern science has already proven itself to be a pathetic collection of
truly insane megalomaniacs who will gladly splice the genes of animals
and insects into crops so that they can create vaccine crops, or
vaccine-carrying mosquitoes, or goats that produce spider silk, or some
other kind of monstrosity that serves the power-tripping globalists.
And the marvel of modern-day fast food has already proven that people will eat anything marketed to them as food. Case in point? Chicken McNuggets. Thatís a hodge podge of industrial chemicals and so-called mechanically-separated chicken, which itself is a meat processing freak show. (http://www.naturalnews.com/032820_Chicken_McNuggets_ingredients.html)
I guess if you set up a test tube meat lab, splice together a bunch of
genes from various species (humans, cows, dogs, insects, ogres, possums
and Janet Napolitano) and then grow a vat of some sort of convulsing
fibrous tissue that can be made into a 99-cent hamburger, then the great
masses will eat it! Who cares what the tissues are floating in, right?
As long as itís offered with a combo meal that includes French fries and
an aspartame-laced Diet Coke, people will chug it straight down while
watching NBA games and declaring, "Weíre winning!"
No doubt test
tube hamburger makers will tout their meat as being "Cruelty Free" by
saying "No animals were killed in the harvesting of this meat." Maybe
not, but how many humans will be killed in the consumption of it?
A mysterious financial supporter backs the entire thingBy
the way, this whole freak show of artificial meat production is being
financed by an "...anonymous and extremely wealthy benefactor who Prof
Post claims is a household name with a reputation for íturning
everything into goldí."
I wouldnít be surprised at all to learn
that Bill Gates was behind it -- or someone similarly motivated by a
global depopulation agenda.
Bottom line: Artificial meat may be
an extraordinary idea, but given the total lack of ethics found in the
scientific community today, I wouldnít trust these people any farther
than I could hurl a cow chip.
(« Go Back)